Formula |
CAS |
C23H46N6O13 |
1405-11-3 |
CAS: Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number
Background
Neomycin sulfate is a widely used antibiotic.
Synonyms
Fradiomycin
Framycetin
Myacyne
Mycifradin
Neloate
Neodecyllin
Neomas
Neomin
Neomycin sulfate
Neomycin undecylenate
Nivemycin
Pimavecort
Soframycin
Vonamycin Powder V
Uses
Antibiotic in skin creams, powders and ointments and in drops used in the
eyes and ears.
Growth promoter for veterinary use
Cross-Reactions
Bacitracin
Butirosin
Dihydrostreptomycin
Framycetin
Gentamycin
Kanamycin
Paromomycin
Spectinomycin
Tobramycin
Unusual Reactions
Contact urticaria
References
1.
|
Anonymous,
Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in North America: 1972.
Archives of Dermatology, 1973. 108(4): p. 537-40.
|
2.
|
Fisher,
A.A., Allergic dermatitis medicamentosa: the "systemic
contact-type variety". Cutis, 1976. 18(5): p. 637-42.
|
3.
|
Marzulli,
F.N. and H.I. Maibach, Contact allergy: predictive
testing in man. Contact Dermatitis, 1976. 2(1): p. 1-17.
|
4.
|
Fisher,
A.A., Fifty years experience with contact dermatitis. Cutis, 1977. 19(1): p. 18-20, 26-32.
|
5.
|
Husain,
S.L., Contact dermatitis in the West of Scotland.
Contact Dermatitis, 1977. 3(6): p. 327-32.
|
6.
|
Schorr,
W.F. and H.B. Ridgway, Tobramycin-neomycin cross-sensitivity.
Contact Dermatitis, 1977. 3(3): p. 133-7.
|
7.
|
Binnick,
A.N. and W.E. Clendenning, Bacitracin contact dermatitis
[letter]. Contact Dermatitis, 1978. 4(3): p. 180-1.
|
8.
|
Forstrom, L. and V.
Pirila, Cross-sensitivity within the neomycin
group of antibiotics. Contact Dermatitis, 1978. 4(5): p. 312.
|
9.
|
Camarasa,
J.M., First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis
in Spain - 1977. Spanish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Acta
Dermato-Venereologica. Supplementum, 1979. 59(85): p. 33-7.
|
10.
|
Fraki,
J.E., L. Peltonen, and V.K. Hopsu-Havu, Allergy to various
components of topical preparations in stasis dermatitis and leg ulcer.
Contact Dermatitis, 1979. 5(2): p. 97-100.
|
11.
|
Lachapelle,
J.M. and D. Tennstedt, Epidemiological survey of
occupational contact dermatitis of the hands in Belgium. Contact Dermatitis,
1979. 5(4): p. 244-8.
|
12.
|
Prystowsky,
S.D., et al., Allergic contact hypersensitivity
to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine, and benzocaine. Relationships between age,
sex, history of exposure, and reactivity to standard patch tests and
use tests in a general population. Archives of Dermatology, 1979. 115(8):
p. 959-62.
|
13.
|
Agathos, M.,
Anaphylactic reaction to framycetin (neomycin B)
and lignocaine. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(3): p. 236-7.
|
14.
|
Epstein, E.,
Contact dermatitis to neomycin with false negative
patch tests: allergy established by intradermal and usage tests. Contact
Dermatitis, 1980. 6(3): p. 219-20.
|
15.
|
Samsoen, M., et
al., Cross-sensitivity between aminoside antibiotics.
Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(2): p. 141.
|
16.
|
Wilkinson,
J.D., E.M. Hambly, and D.S. Wilkinson, Comparison
of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England. II. Medicaments.
Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 1980. 60(3): p. 245-9.
|
17.
|
Hannuksela, M., R.
Suhonen, and L. Forstrom, Delayed contact
allergies in patients with photosensitivity dermatitis. Acta
Dermato-Venereologica,
1981. 61(4): p. 303-6.
|
18.
|
Rudzki, E.,
Some peculiarities of contact dermatitis in poland.
Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupational & Environmental Dermatoses,
1981. 29(4): p. 98-101.
|
19.
|
Hirano, S. and K.
Yoshikawa, Patch testing with European and
American standard allergens in Japanese patients. Contact Dermatitis,
1982. 8(1): p. 48-50.
|
20.
|
Kalimo, K. and K.
Lammintausta, 24 and 48 h allergen exposure
in patch testing. Comparative study with 11 common contact allergens and
NiCl2. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 10(1): p. 25-9.
|
21.
|
Angelini, G.,
G.A. Vena, and C.L. Meneghini, Allergic contact
dermatitis to some medicaments. Contact Dermatitis, 1985. 12(5):
p. 263-9.
|
22.
|
Falk,
E.S., H. Hektoen, and P.O. Thune, Skin and respiratory
tract symptoms in veterinary surgeons. Contact Dermatitis, 1985. 12(5):
p. 274-8.
|
23.
|
Fisher,
A.A., Allergic contact dermatitis in early infancy. Cutis, 1985. 35(4): p. 315-6.
|
24.
|
Rebandel, P. and E.
Rudzki, Occupational contact sensitivity
in oculists. Contact Dermatitis, 1986. 15(2): p. 92.
|
25.
|
Katz,
B.E. and A.A. Fisher, Bacitracin: a unique topical antibiotic
sensitizer. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1987. 17(6):
p. 1016-24.
|
26.
|
Gollhausen,
R., et al., Trends in allergic contact sensitization.
Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 18(3): p. 147-54.
|
27.
|
Hogan,
D.J., M. Hill, and P.R. Lane, Results of routine patch
testing of 542 patients in Saskatoon, Canada. Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 19(2):
p. 120-4.
|
28.
|
Shupp,
D.L. and R.K. Winkelmann, The role of patch testing in
stasis dermatitis. Cutis, 1988. 42(6): p. 528-30.
|
29.
|
Goh,
C.L., Contact sensitivity to topical antimicrobials. (II).
Sensitizing potentials of some topical antimicrobials. Contact Dermatitis,
1989. 21(3): p. 166-71.
|
30.
|
Goh,
C.L., Contact sensitivity to topical antimicrobials (I).
Epidemiology in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 21(1):
p. 46-8.
|
31.
|
Guin,
J.D. and D. Phillips, Erythroderma from systemic contact
dermatitis: a complication of systemic gentamicin in a patient with contact
allergy to neomycin. Cutis, 1989. 43(6): p. 564-7.
|
32.
|
Macfarlane,
A.W., et al., Delayed patch test reactions at days
7 and 9. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 20(2): p. 127-32.
|
33.
|
Massone,
L., et al., 4-day patch test reactions to neomycin
and formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 21(5): p. 344-5.
|
34.
|
Nethercott, J.R., G.
Nield, and D.L. Holness, A review of 79
cases of eyelid dermatitis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology,
1989. 21(2 Pt 1): p. 223-30.
|
35.
|
Puig,
L.L., M. Abadias, and A. Alomar, Erythroderma due to ribostamycin.
Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 21(2): p. 79-82.
|
36.
|
Rudzki, E., et
al., Sensitivity to amikacin. Contact Dermatitis,
1989. 20(5): p. 391.
|
37.
|
Storrs,
F.J., et al., Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions
in patients patch tested in North America--1984 to 1985. Journal of
the American Academy of Dermatology, 1989. 20(6): p. 1038-45.
|
38.
|
Grandinetti,
P.J. and J.F. Fowler, Jr., Simultaneous contact
allergy to neomycin, bacitracin, and polymyxin. Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology, 1990. 23(4 Pt 1): p. 646-7.
|
39.
|
Barros,
M.A., et al., Patch testing in children: a study of
562 schoolchildren [see comments]. Contact Dermatitis, 1991. 25(3):
p. 156-9.
|
40.
|
Edman,
B., Computerized analysis of concomitant contact allergens.
Contact Dermatitis, 1991. 24(2): p. 110-3.
|
41.
|
Mariani,
R., et al., Allergic contact conjunctivitis without
eyelid involvement. Contact Dermatitis, 1991. 24(3): p. 227.
|
42.
|
Shehade,
S.A., M.H. Beck, and V.F. Hillier, Epidemiological
survey of standard series patch test results and observations on day 2
and day 4 readings. Contact Dermatitis, 1991. 24(2): p. 119-22.
|
43.
|
Gette,
M.T., J.G. Marks, Jr., and M.E. Maloney, Frequency of
postoperative allergic contact dermatitis to topical antibiotics. Archives
of Dermatology, 1992. 128(3): p. 365-7.
|
44.
|
Goh,
C.L., Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch
test techniques in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 27(2):
p. 84-9.
|
45.
|
Lammintausta, K., K.
Kalimo, and V.L. Fagerlund, Patch test
reactions in atopic patients. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 26(4):
p. 234-40.
|
46.
|
Lim,
J.T., et al., Changing trends in the epidemiology of contact
dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 26(5): p.
321-6.
|
19-06-2011
(JRM) - www.huidziekten.nl
|
|