CAS: Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number
Background
Wool is a natural protein fiber consisting mainly of protein, an
oily, waxy external lipid fraction and a minor internal lipid content.
hydrolysis of the external lipids result in a complex mixture of esters
of alochols and fatty acids of which wool alcohols (lanolin) are the main
allergen. Other alcohols like stearylalcohol, cetylalcohol and oleylalcohol,
may less frequently cause contact allergies. The composition of lanolin
varies based on time and place of manufacture. The sebum of sheep constitutes
5% to 25% of the weight of sheared raw wool.
Lanolin is used in cosmetic and pharmacologic preparations because
of its emollient, moisturizing, and emulsifying properties. Numerous chemical
modifications of lanolin are used to improve its attributes and eliminate
particular disadvantages.
Because lanolin is a complex natural product, the allergens have not
been definitively delineated. The wide variety and purity of lanolin make
complete identification of its components virtually impossible. Lanolin-sensitive
patients can sometimes tolerate one lanolin preparation but not another.
Lanolin allergy is most common among leg ulcer patients.
Synonyms
Anhydrous lanolin
Wool fat
Wool wax
Wool grease
Wool alcohol
Clearlin
Glossylan
Golden Dawn
Hychol
Nodorian
Sparklelan
Adeps lanae anhydrous
Aloholes lanae
Names for Modified Lanolin
Lanolin acid
Amerlate
Argowax
Facilan
Lanolic acids
Ritalafa
Skliro
Lanolin alcohol
Argo wax
Fancol LA
Hartolan
Lanalol
Nimco
Rita wax
Lanolin oil
Argonol
Fluilan
Lanalene
Lanogene
Lanoil
Lantrol
Lipolan
Ritalan
Vigilan
Lanolin wax
Albalan
Lanalene wax
Lanfrax
Lanocerin
Lanowax
Uses
Cosmetics- creams, lotions, ointments, etc.
Cutting oil emulsions
Furniture polish
Furs
Inks
Leather
Metal corrosion prevention
Paper
Textiles
Topical medications
Waxes
Cross-Reactions
Lanette wax
Unusual Reactions
References
1.
|
Fisher,
A.A., F. Pascher, and N.B. Kanof, Allergic contact dermatitis
due to ingredients of vehicles. A "vehicle tray" for patch testing.
Archives of Dermatology, 1971. 104(3): p. 286-90.
|
2.
|
Breit, R. and H.J.
Bandmann, Contact dermatitis XXII. Dermatitis
from lanolin. British Journal of Dermatology, 1973. 88(4): p.
414-6.
|
3.
|
Hannuksela, M., M.
Kousa, and V. Pirila, Contact sensitivity
to emulsifiers. Contact Dermatitis, 1976. 2(4): p. 201-4.
|
4.
|
Hannuksela, M., M.
Kousa, and V. Pirila, Allergy to ingredients
of vehicles. Contact Dermatitis, 1976. 2(2): p. 105-10.
|
5.
|
Clark, E.W., E. Cronin, and D.S. Wilkinson,
Lanolin with reduced
sensitizing potential. A preliminary note. Contact Dermatitis, 1977. 3(2):
p. 69-74.
|
6.
|
Husain,
S.L., Contact dermatitis in the West of Scotland.
Contact Dermatitis, 1977. 3(6): p. 327-32.
|
7.
|
Blondeel, A., J.
Oleffe, and G. Achten, Contact allergy in 330
dermatological patients. Contact Dermatitis, 1978. 4(5): p.
270-6.
|
8.
|
Foussereau, J.,
Allergy to turpentine, lanolin and nickel in
Strasbourg. Contact Dermatitis, 1978. 4(5): p. 300.
|
9.
|
Hambly,
E.M., L. Levia, and D.S. Wilkinson, Wool intolerance
in atopic subjects. Contact Dermatitis, 1978. 4(4): p. 240-1.
|
10.
|
Oleffe,
J.A., A. Blondeel, and S. Boschmans, Patch testing with
lanolin. Contact Dermatitis, 1978. 4(4): p. 233-47.
|
11.
|
Calnan, C.D.,
Lanolin in protective metal coatings. Contact
Dermatitis, 1979. 5(4): p. 267-8.
|
12.
|
Camarasa,
J.M., First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis
in Spain - 1977. Spanish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Acta
Dermato-Venereologica. Supplementum, 1979. 59(85): p. 33-7.
|
13.
|
Fraki,
J.E., L. Peltonen, and V.K. Hopsu-Havu, Allergy to various
components of topical preparations in stasis dermatitis and leg ulcer.
Contact Dermatitis, 1979. 5(2): p. 97-100.
|
14.
|
Mortensen, T.,
Allergy to lanolin. Contact Dermatitis, 1979. 5(3):
p. 137-9.
|
15.
|
Schlossman,
M.L. and J.P. McCarthy, Lanolin and derivatives
chemistry: relationship to allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis,
1979. 5(2): p. 65-72.
|
16.
|
Hammershoy, O.,
Standard patch test results in 3,225 consecutive
Danish patient from 1973 to 1977. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(4):
p. 263-8.
|
17.
|
Wilkinson, J.D.,
E.M. Hambly, and D.S. Wilkinson, Comparison
of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England. II. Medicaments.
Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 1980. 60(3): p. 245-9.
|
18.
|
Clark, E.W., et al.,
Lanolin of reduced sensitizing potential.
Contact Dermatitis, 1981. 7(2): p. 80-3.
|
19.
|
Cronin, E.,
Lanolin labelling of cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis,
1981. 7(1): p. 53.
|
20.
|
Agarwal, K.,
Contact allergic purpura to wool dust. Contact
Dermatitis, 1982. 8(4): p. 281-2.
|
21.
|
Giorgini, S.,
M.C. Melli, and A. Sertoli, Comments on the allergenic
activity of lanolin. Contact Dermatitis, 1983. 9(5): p. 425-6.
|
22.
|
Kligman, A.M.,
Lanolin allergy: crisis or comedy. Contact
Dermatitis, 1983. 9(2): p. 99-107.
|
23.
|
van
Ketel, W.G. and J. Wemer, Allergy to lanolin and "lanolin-free"
creams. Contact Dermatitis, 1983. 9(5): p. 420.
|
24.
|
Daly,
B.M. and C.J. Stevenson, Contact dermatitis to wood wool.
Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 11(2): p. 123.
|
25.
|
Fisher,
A.A., Purpuric contact dermatitis. Cutis, 1984. 33(4):
p. 346, 349, 351.
|
26.
|
Fregert, S., I.
Dahlquist, and L. Trulsson, An attempt to isolate
and identify allergens in lanolin. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 10(1):
p. 16-9.
|
27.
|
Shmunes, E. and J.
Keil, The role of atopy in occupational dermatoses.
Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 11(3): p. 174-8.
|
28.
|
Edman, B.,
Sites of contact dermatitis in relationship to particular
allergens. Contact Dermatitis, 1985. 13(3): p. 129-35.
|
29.
|
Rademaker, M., J.D. Kirby, and
I.R. White, Contact cheilitis
to shellac, Lanpol 5 and colophony. Contact Dermatitis, 1986. 15(5):
p. 307-8.
|
30.
|
Bendsoe, N., A.
Bjornberg, and H. Asnes, Itching from wool fibres
in atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1987. 17(1): p. 21-2.
|
31.
|
de
Groot, A.C., et al., The role of contact allergy in the spectrum
of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries. Contact Dermatitis,
1988. 19(3): p. 195-201.
|
32.
|
Edman, B.,
The usefulness of detailed information to patients
with contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 19(1): p. 43-7.
|
33.
|
Gollhausen, R., et al.,
Trends in allergic contact sensitization.
Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 18(3): p. 147-54.
|
34.
|
Edman, B. and H.
Moller, Testing a purified lanolin preparation
by a randomized procedure. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 20(4):
p. 287-90.
|
35.
|
Lachapelle,
J.M., A left versus right side comparative study
of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients. Contact
Dermatitis, 1989. 20(1): p. 51-6.
|
36.
|
Marston, S.,
Contact dermatitis from cetostearyl alcohol in
hydrocortisone butyrate lipocream, and from lanolin. Contact Dermatitis,
1991. 24(5): p. 372.
|
37.
|
Kristensen, O.,
A prospective study of the development of hand
eczema in an automobile manufacturing industry. Contact Dermatitis,
1992. 26(5): p. 341-5.
|
38.
|
Lever, R. and A. Forsyth,
Allergic contact dermatitis in atopic
dermatitis. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. Supplementum, 1992. 176:
p. 95-98.
|
39.
|
Quirce, S., et al.,
Occupational dermatitis in a ewe milker.
Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 27(1): p. 56.
|
40.
|
O'Donnell, B.F. and C. Hodgson,
Allergic contact dermatitis
due to lanolin in an adhesive plaster. Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 28(3):
p. 191-2.
|
41.
|
Pasche-Koo, F., et al.,
High sensitization rate to emulsifiers
in patients with chronic leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 31(4):
p. 226-8.
|
42.
|
Stam-Westerveld,
E.B., et al., Rubbing test responses of the
skin to man-made mineral fibres of different diameters. Contact Dermatitis,
1994. 31(1): p. 1-4.
|
43.
|
Henderson, C.A.,
A.S. Highet, and H.K. Shamy, The frequency
of lanolin contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 1995. 32(1):
p. 52.
|
44.
|
Kligman AM. The myth of lanolin allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:103-7
|
13-08-2011
(JRM) - www.huidziekten.nl
|
|